how can we attain ‘truth’ if all we can do is justification this comes down to the idea that there are historically two forms of truth Truth, or perhaps we should say 'truth', on foucault's account is the product of systems of social power And each system produces its own variant of truth Do alethic nihilists think that all deception and secrecy has the same moral value that "lying" This seems strange if taken to extremes
So what separates a virtuous/ The reasons i think that logic is not enough to find the truth are I sometimes conclude that something is 100% true, and can be observed easily As it is based on logic, and then people don't bel. Indeed in lambda calculus everything is treated as an expression and every concept, including truth and falsehood, must be represented as a lambda expression or specifically a particular abstraction chosen by church The church encoding of true and false is a way to model boolean values where true and false are not values in the traditional absolute external sense but rather functions that.
What is the relation between truths and the things that makes them true Not to be confused with what is the truth, which is a completely different matter. Largely in the spirit of a correspondence theory of truth, the liar paradox is like any abstraction that seems to be irrelevant to states of affair in the physical world After all, a paradox by definition is something that cannot be in its fundamental sense, like a square circle. Truth consists in the predicate's belonging to the subject and is posited and asserted in the proposition as belonging The structure and the structural parts of the truth, i.e., of the true proposition (object and assertion), are exactly fitted to that by which truth as such guides itself to the thing as the bearer and to its properties.
I am asking, because after true, false and neither, the additional truth value basically don'.
OPEN
