Your other suggestion of by one hundred times is definitely better than a. People often say that percentages greater than 100 make no sense because you can't have more than all of something This is simply silly and mathematically ignorant A percentage is just a ratio between two numbers There are many situations where it is perfectly reasonable for the numerator of a fraction to be greater than the denominator. The reason is that when using percentages we are referring to the difference between the final amount and the initial amount as a fraction (or percent) of the original amount.
You miss 100 percent of the shots you don't take Kanter, aarp—asset accumulation, retention and protection, taxes 69 Wayne gretzky, relating the comment of one of his early coaches who, frustrated by his lack of scoring in an important game told him, 'you miss 100% of the shots you never take.'. All of your variants are grammatically correct, and will be easily understood by native english speakers The less than x is idiomatically identical to under x when referring to monetary amounts, as is more than x with over x However, if your audience is international, you might prefer to say items costing less than x or items costing more than x simply to avoid any possibility of confusion.
For example, in legally binding documents, like contracts or exhibits to contracts, the spelled out number is the legally binding number Marking or beginning a century, with the example the centurial years 1600 and 1700 But there is a word that is widely used to indicate the range of years or centuries covered by an article or book While 100 dollars is plural so you naturally say were But twenty quid was taken But it would be a score was taken
Similarly twenty bob, nicker, wedge or wonga would be was But 20 smackeroos were taken. One of the most confusing things for me is spelling english numerals What is grammatical way to spell the following numbers in the context of writing the numeral in a receipt
OPEN
