Today, i want to know the distinction between the two similar senses of these prepositions I use it when explaining those prepositions in my classes, just before i explain that the distinction between under and underneath is microscopic, and often not important. So, i am wondering if it's possible to use under instead of underneath in the above sentence? I bring this up since Is there an adjective to describe an object (edit A dog house or a headstone
The object is not necessarily a living thing) on the ground and underneath a tree I thought of treeside, but its The much more common expression is to work under, but i saw work underneath in this wikipedia article and for some reason it bothered me In return, the empress worked underneath her and received formal artistic training. The usual expression to indicate that a location is inside a body of water, below the surface, is “under water” A stack exchange user who seems to be a native english speaker writes
You are going along in your life and everything is ok and then suddenly, you realize it is really not But it is not correct—at least not yet—in place of chalk it up in the idiomatic expression chalk it up to x. The computer killed the middle case c, a raised c with 2 small lines underneath it It was commonly available in old printing typefaces but was lost in conversion to computers.
OPEN
