If so, then what did you do to resolve this For me, i never knew whether it was accep. I just received a proofread version of an academic manuscript from my copy editor She essentially changed all of the instances in which i had written given that to given. i've tried to read up. I would like to know if you can use that with a comma after it Findings show that, during the initial stages of love, there is increased blood flow to the brain.
In all seriousness, are there any common patterns or strategies people use to avoid having to write a sentence in which that that appears Evidential decision theory recommends ta. Of the below answer, the following section (example 1) is incorrect Your new example now contains a main verb (=, that is, equals), so what you have is correct But you can use either a semicolon or commas To use a simpler sentence
That is, that 4 is the sum of 2 and 2 In 1, we have two separate clauses, which we can join with a semicolon Actually, there's more to this than mentioned in some other answers The word that is a subordinator It is not a relative word like who, where, when, or which Even in integrated relative clauses, they are not always interchangeable
When the relative construction follows a fronted preposition, only relative words will do, so relative pronoun which is available, but that isn't Is that'd an appropriate contraction of that and would I say it, but i'm not sure if it's a legitimate contraction in written form. I generally use the rule of thumb of using who when referring to a person and that when referring to an object Jim is someone who makes me smile I was nearly knocked out by the ball tha.
As a pronoun, determiner, adverb and conjunction I'm wondering about its usage specifically as a conjunction Is any of these two sentences incorrect
OPEN
