If so, then what did you do to resolve this For me, i never knew whether it was accep. I just received a proofread version of an academic manuscript from my copy editor She essentially changed all of the instances in which i had written given that to given. i've tried to read up. In all seriousness, are there any common patterns or strategies people use to avoid having to write a sentence in which that that appears Evidential decision theory recommends ta.
I would like to know if you can use that with a comma after it Findings show that, during the initial stages of love, there is increased blood flow to the brain. Is any of these two sentences incorrect The following sentence was on one of the tests What would you like to do that others have told you is impossible Students have asked why that could not be replaced with what
The word that is a subordinator It is not a relative word like who, where, when, or which Even in integrated relative clauses, they are not always interchangeable When the relative construction follows a fronted preposition, only relative words will do, so relative pronoun which is available, but that isn't Is that'd an appropriate contraction of that and would I say it, but i'm not sure if it's a legitimate contraction in written form.
This is something that i've recently had someone tell me is not grammatically correct Now, to be honest, it's not something i would likely ever use in everyday language but that doesn't necessaril. I generally use the rule of thumb of using who when referring to a person and that when referring to an object Jim is someone who makes me smile I was nearly knocked out by the ball tha.
OPEN
