In your example, she is being emphasised. The at is redundant It is not needed because the questions could be more concisely put as where is she/he? This redundancy, and the efforts of seventeenth and eighteenth century grammarians to align english with latin, lead some people to say it is ungrammatical to end with at . So as grammarians do you think the contracted form of she has should be she 's More importantly, are there rules for contracting words
Say, if i wanted to express she was as a contraction could it also be she 's or she's Taken from the free online dictionary In a 1989 article from the los angeles times, for instance, writer dan sullivan notes, what's wrong with reinventing the wheel? Upon answering the telephone, the person calling asks if joan is available If joan is the person who answered the phone, should she say this is her or this is she? Sometimes people are referring to mechanical objects as she
Are there any rules when it is appropriate to use she instead of it, and is he. Referring to a past time of reference, she had never had sex by the time of her 18th birthday, three years ago She had had sex by the time of her 18th birthday, three years ago Another mode of use is its auxiliary use to encapsulate a perfected/completed participation E.g., have experience, do you paint houses Are you familiar with painting.
She was in on the drama when the conman showed up at the stage door If you are an actor in something, it's in She was in cat on a hot tin roof She was in the movie cat on a hot tin roof She was in several west end plays Versus to be on tv to be on the radio to be on tv or the radio just means that a person has been recorded in that medium.
If all trans people used he, she, or they, simply giving a nomative pronoun would allow the listener to extrapolate all other pronouns However, some trans people prefer to use neopronouns, which don't always declinate in a intuitive way, such as e/em/es or thon/thon/thons.
OPEN
