Transaction Could Not Be Processed Onlyfans How To Fix It?

Is there a better approach that improves maintainability and performance of the application that uses this transaction

I have a long running process that holds open a transaction for the full duration I have no control over the way this is executed Because a transaction is held open for the full duration, whe. I'm used to use transaxction blocks in postgresql like begin But in oracle it seems tha. Shouldn't begin transaction [tran1] be placed inside try

This is my first time writing transaction, is it correct/best practice to have the try/catch block inside the transaction or should the transaction be inside the try block? But when i call the second stored procedure as Exec uspstoredprocname i get the following error Transaction count after execute indicates a mismatching number of begin and commit statements Previous count = 1, current count = 0 I have read the answers in other such questions and am unable to find where exactly the commit count is getting.

The alternative is an ambient transaction

New in.net 2.0, the transactionscope object (system.transactions.dll) allows use over a range of operations (suitable providers will automatically enlist in the ambient transaction) A distributed transaction is a transaction on a distributed database (i.e., one where the data is stored on a number of physically separate systems) It's noteworthy because there's a fair amount of complexity involved (especially in the communications) to assure that all the machines remain in agreement, so either the whole transaction. The good news is a transaction in sql server can span multiple batches (each exec is treated as a separate batch.) you can wrap your exec statements in a begin transaction and commit but you'll need to go a step further and rollback if any errors occur.