Over time, easa became responsible for operations and licensing as well In 2009 the jaa system was disbanded 考FAA或者EASA说明你就是想跳槽了，要不考了也不一定用上，FAA (A&P)机体和发动机，需要三年经验，（A）机体，貌似是18个月，香港新加坡可以考笔试，实操需要到美利坚，有朋友大学就去考了，花五六十万，没必要。 EASA分A、B1、B2和C级执照组成。 Pass a full easa theoretical atpl examination obtain an easa medical certificate class 1 obtain an easa language proficiency, minimum level 4 pass an easa atpl skill test, in accordance with regulation (eu) 1178/2011 Regulation (eu) 1178/2011 is here, go to (table of contents on the left side) annex iii b conversion of licences. According to easa 965/2012 definition (120d & 120e) [amendmt
The key number here is dh, if dh is at or above 250 is type a, if dh is lower is type b Your approach has to be classified as type a Kind of instrument approach procedure same regulation and amendment but different definition. EASA最大的问题不在于给不给C919适航认证，中国是担心C919拿不到EASA认证吗？ 连毛子SSJ都可以拿到。 中国有意见的是欧洲人不肯搞CAAC和EASA互认，采用一机一认形式的话，控制权完全在欧洲人手里。 从这点讲，欧洲人一点诚意都没有，还不如第一任期的懂王。 Easa has not incorporated this specific phraseology into sera yet, although while researching for this answer, i found an amendment proposal to incorporate it to a future release Easa regulations take precedence over icao regulations
Easa requires pilots to log separately night time and night landings in the personal logbook Now, i'm not sure in which period of time a landing is a night landing and flight time is night flight time. They recruiment requirements are easa cpl (or atpl) with ir and mep and (frozen atpl) Is the atpl theory examination expired or is it called the frozen atpl However, there are quite a few different sy. See approach ban and required visual reference easa (cat.op.mpa.305) for ease of reference (a) the commander or the pilot to whom conduct of the flight has been delegated may commence an instrument approach regardless of the reported rvr/vis
(b) if the reported rvr/vis is less than the applicable minimum the approach shall not be continued:
OPEN
