What's nice about this that int64_t should not have issues on a 32bit system (this will impact the performance though). In this case, depending upon what your use case is, you might be better off using int (or long long) for s1 and s2 There are some functions in c/posix that could/should use size_t, but don't because of historical reasons For example, the second parameter to fgets should ideally be size_t, but is int. The size of every matplotlib element is determined by the interaction of three properties Fig.get_size_inches() and change it via fig.set_size_inches().
In several c++ examples i see a use of the type size_t where i would have used a simple int What's the difference, and why size_t should be better? It is unlikely that any implementation will use wider type for ssize_t than it uses for size_t This immediately means that the price you will pay for the ability to return negative values is halving of the positive range of the type Ssize_max is usually size_max / 2 This should be kept in mind.
This means you can set your legend fontsize at the beginning of your code, and not worry about setting it for each individual legend If you use a named size e.g 'medium', then the legend text will scale with the global font.size in rcparams To change font.size use plt.rc(font.size='medium') What is the command to find the size of all the databases I am able to find the size of a specific database by using following command
The size_t type is the unsigned integer type that is the result of the sizeof operator (and the offsetof operator), so it is guaranteed to be big enough to contain the size of the biggest object your system can handle (e.g., a static array of 8gb) The size_t type may be bigger than, equal to, or smaller than an unsigned int, and your compiler might make assumptions about it for optimization.
OPEN
