The privacy rule permits, but does not require, a covered entity voluntarily to obtain patient consent for uses and disclosures of protected health information for treatment, payment, and health care operations. Consent is an optional process that empowers patients to make informed decisions about their medical care Authorization, on the other hand, is a more formal and mandatory process It is required when healthcare providers need to use or disclose phi for purposes not covered by consent. Central to hipaa's privacy rule are two concepts The differences between these two terms have implications for healthcare providers and patients.
What is the difference between consent and authorization under the hipaa privacy rule “consent” is a general term under the privacy rule, but “authorization” has much more specific requirements. In essence, a written authorization (as opposed to a “consent to release”) is the document or form that a patient signs allowing the health care provider to release confidential information, including the treatment records, to a third party. Authorization is often used in official or legal contexts and refers to granting permission or approval for someone to do something, while consent is more commonly used in personal or informal situations and implies a voluntary agreement or approval. A hippa authorization permits the medical care provider to release information to the designated recipient A consent is what a patient usually signs which permits a doctor to perform a particular procedure.
A compliant authorization is much more detailed than basic patient consent.
OPEN
